What is fault ride through
Fault Ride Through (FRT) is the grid-code requirement that an inverter-based generator stay connected to the grid during brief voltage and frequency disturbances, and support voltage and frequency recovery through reactive and active power injection. FRT includes Low Voltage Ride Through (LVRT) for dips and High Voltage Ride Through (HVRT) for swells.
The requirement emerged from wind power experience in the 2000s, when fault-driven mass disconnection of wind farms threatened grid stability. As solar PV capacity grew to gigawatt scale, the same logic applied. Modern grid codes require both wind and solar inverters to behave as grid-supporting devices, not as fragile loads.
In India, the CEA Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid 2019 set FRT profiles for generators above 10 kW. Utility plant PPAs reference these requirements with penalties for non-compliance.
Fault ride through explained simply
Imagine a power grid as a busy intersection. When a traffic accident briefly stops the flow, you do not want every driver behind the accident to throw up their hands and abandon their car. You want them to ride through the moment, get past the obstruction, and keep traffic moving.
FRT is the rule that says solar and wind inverters cannot abandon the grid at the first sign of disturbance. They must stay connected, inject reactive support to help voltage recover, and come back to normal power once the fault clears.
Why FRT matters
Grid stability. Without FRT, a brief 100 ms fault in one substation would trip gigawatts of solar across a region, dragging frequency down catastrophically.
Penetration limits. Grid operators allow more solar capacity on the network when they trust the inverters to stay connected through disturbances.
PPA compliance. Utility solar PPAs reference FRT compliance. Non-compliant trips during real grid events lead to financial penalties.
Reduced cascading risk. FRT support during a fault helps the protection system isolate the fault correctly.
Smart inverter foundation. FRT is one of the core smart-inverter functions that also include reactive power, voltage support and frequency response.
How FRT works
- The inverter continuously monitors voltage and frequency at its AC terminals.
- When voltage drops below the trip threshold, conventional protection would disconnect. FRT logic instead checks if the voltage trajectory is inside the protected ride-through profile.
- If yes, the inverter stays connected.
- During the dip, the inverter injects reactive current up to 100 percent of rated apparent power, supporting voltage at the connection point.
- Active power is temporarily reduced to free apparent power capacity for reactive injection.
- Once voltage recovers, the inverter ramps active power back up over a defined recovery period.
- If the voltage trajectory falls below the protected profile, the inverter trips as a last resort.
Technical deep dive
LVRT profile (CEA Grid Code 2019)
| Voltage (pu) | Time (ms) | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | Steady | Normal operation |
| 0.85 to 1.0 | Indefinite | Normal operation |
| 0.50 to 0.85 | 150 | Ride through |
| 0.15 to 0.50 | 150 | Ride through |
| Below 0.15 | Recovery curve | Trip allowed beyond curve |
The recovery curve linearly increases the minimum permitted voltage from 0.15 pu at 150 ms to 0.85 pu at 1500 ms.
HVRT profile
| Voltage (pu) | Time (ms) | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 to 1.10 | Indefinite | Normal operation |
| 1.10 to 1.20 | 2000 | Ride through |
| 1.20 to 1.30 | 100 | Ride through |
| Above 1.30 | Trip allowed |
Reactive current support
During the dip, the inverter injects reactive current Iq:
Where K is typically 2.0 to 4.0 per unit. Reactive injection is capped at 100 percent of rated apparent power.
Active power recovery
After voltage recovers above 0.9 pu, the inverter ramps active power back to pre-fault value at a configured rate, typically 10 to 50 percent of rated per second.
Real-world applications
Utility-scale solar plants under SECI and CPSU PPAs.
C&I plants above 10 kW connected to LT or HT.
Hybrid wind-solar plants where common point of coupling requires coordinated FRT.
Distributed generation in states with smart-inverter mandates.
Grid-supporting BESS in firm renewable energy packages.
Advantages
Maintains grid stability under disturbances.
Allows higher renewable penetration.
Reduces cascading trip risk.
Supports voltage recovery through reactive current injection.
Enables smart-inverter functions like volt-var, volt-watt and frequency response.
Limitations
Hardware stress. Inverter components experience thermal and current cycling during ride-through.
Coordination complexity. FRT settings must align with upstream protection.
False ride-through during real grid loss could compromise safety unless coordinated with anti-islanding protection.
Older inverters cannot be retrofitted. Replacement is the only path to FRT compliance.
Test infrastructure is expensive. Programmable grid simulators required.
Common problems
Inverter trips during a disturbance that should have been within the FRT profile. Firmware update or setting adjustment.
Reactive current injection during FRT increases voltage at a weak connection point, causing overvoltage trip on neighbours.
PPA penalty for non-compliant trips during real grid events.
Coordination conflict with anti-islanding. Both protections trigger simultaneously.
Old inverter without FRT capability blocks DISCOM commissioning of a large solar EPC project.
DISCOM does not have programmable grid simulator for type test.
Best practices
Specify FRT compliance to CEA Grid Code 2019 in inverter purchase contracts.
Validate type test reports from accredited labs against recognised inverter certification standards.
Conduct plant-level FRT test at commissioning, witnessed by DISCOM, backed by CEIG-approved electrical drawings where required.
Coordinate FRT settings with upstream protection during plant design.
Document FRT events for compliance audits.
Plan for combined LVRT, HVRT and frequency response settings.
Comparison: FRT vs anti-islanding vs UV protection
| Protection | Acts when | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-islanding | Grid fully lost | Disconnect within 2 s |
| FRT | Brief voltage or frequency disturbance | Stay connected, inject reactive |
| UV/OV trip | Voltage outside tolerance band, sustained | Disconnect |
| Frequency trip | Frequency outside band, sustained | Disconnect |
Indian market context
CEA Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid (Amendment) Regulations 2019 made FRT mandatory for generators above 10 kW. The standard references LVRT and HVRT profiles with reactive support requirements.
SECI tender bid documents and IPP PPAs include FRT compliance clauses with penalties for sustained non-compliance.
Major inverter brands like Sungrow, Sineng, Huawei, ABB, Solis, Goodwe and others maintain FRT-compliant model series for the Indian market.
Plant-level FRT testing is performed at commissioning by DISCOMs using available grid simulator capability or by relay-driven switching.
Standards and certifications
| Standard | Scope |
|---|---|
| CEA Grid Code 2019 | Indian distribution grid FRT requirements |
| CEA Connectivity Regulations 2013 (as amended 2019) | Indian grid connection regulations, including FRT |
| IEC 61400-27 | Generic electrical simulation models for grid code compliance |
| IEEE 1547-2018 | US grid interconnection, FRT requirements |
| FERC Order 842 | US bulk-power FRT requirements |
| ENTSO-E Network Codes | European FRT requirements |
Common mistakes
Using an inverter without FRT certification for a utility-scale plant.
Mis-setting FRT thresholds, leading to nuisance trips or non-compliance.
Failing to coordinate FRT with anti-islanding.
Skipping plant-level FRT test at commissioning.
Ignoring FRT events in plant logs.
Treating FRT as an inverter-only requirement. Plant controller and switchgear coordination matters too.
Not budgeting for the FRT test infrastructure during commissioning.
Key takeaways
Fault Ride Through is the grid-code requirement that solar inverters above 10 kW stay connected through brief grid disturbances and inject reactive support. CEA Grid Code 2019 defines the Indian LVRT and HVRT profiles. Compliance is mandatory for SECI and utility PPAs, with penalties for non-compliant trips. Modern inverters from major brands are FRT-capable, but firmware settings and plant-level testing decide actual compliance.
Further reading
For how Fault Ride Through plays out in real projects, these guides go deeper:
- Solar Inverter Error Codes: India Troubleshooting
- India Grid Solar Inverter Firmware, Engineer’s Guide
- Solar Inverter Firmware Update, When, How and Why
- Reactive Power Support from Solar Inverters India
Sources
- CEA Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid (Amendment) Regulations 2019.
- IEC 61400-27, Electrical simulation models for grid code compliance verification.
- IEEE 1547-2018, Standard for Interconnection and Interoperability of Distributed Energy Resources.
- FERC Order 842, Essential Reliability Services and the Evolving Bulk-Power System.
- ENTSO-E Network Codes on Requirements for Generators.
- Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND2019-2237, Inverter Ride-Through.
- NREL Technical Report TP-5D00-72528, Grid-Forming Inverter Performance.
- IEA PVPS Task 14 Report on high penetration PV grid integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is fault ride through in simple words?
What is the difference between LVRT and HVRT?
Why is FRT required?
Is FRT same as anti-islanding?
What is the typical LVRT requirement?
Do residential rooftop inverters need FRT?
What is the FRT curve?
Does FRT inject reactive power?
Are central inverters FRT compliant?
Is FRT same as low voltage ride through?
What happens if FRT fails?
How is FRT tested?
Is FRT required for residential systems?
Can FRT cause inverter damage?
What standards govern FRT in India?
From the Blog
Listed by Qbits as its CTO. Current role, technical responsibilities and credentials require confirmation by the company owner.