Skip to content
Guide

Solar CAPEX vs OPEX: Which Model Fits Your Business?

Own the system or buy its power under a PPA? A decision matrix, a worked 100 kW model with formulas, and the sensitivity to tariff, cost, tax position and PPA escalation that decide which model fits a business.

Akash Hirapara
Akash Hirapara CFO
June 5, 2026 Updated October 14, 2026 14 min read

Every business that evaluates rooftop solar in India meets the same fork: buy the system (CAPEX) or buy its power from a developer (OPEX under a RESCO or PPA contract). Neither model is better in the abstract. The answer depends on the roof, the cash, the tax position and the contract. This guide gives a decision matrix and a worked model with every formula shown, so you can replace the assumed inputs with your own quote and bill.

CAPEX and OPEX side by side

CAPEX and OPEX compared across eight dimensions
DimensionCAPEX (own the system)OPEX (RESCO / PPA)
Upfront costFull system cost, or the equity share if financedNone
Who owns the assetThe buyerThe developer
SavingsWhole bill saving, less O&M and replacementGrid tariff less PPA tariff, on units delivered
Performance riskBuyer, or the EPC under the contractDeveloper
Tax benefitThe owner claims any available depreciationThe buyer deducts the PPA payment as an expense
Balance sheetAsset addedOff balance sheet in most cases; confirm with your auditor
ExitSell or keep the system with the buildingGoverned by the contract: buyout, relocation and termination clauses
FitsOwners with long tenure and capitalTenants, short leases, capital-constrained buyers

A worked 100 kW model

This is arithmetic on stated assumptions. It is not a quotation, a tariff order or a prediction.

Assumptions (all illustrative): 100 kW rooftop on an owned building; specific yield of 1,578 kWh per kWp per year (the Bengaluru reference in our irradiance guide), so generation G = 100 x 1,578 = 1,57,800 kWh in year one; grid tariff offset T = ₹8 per kWh, flat; all generation used on site; system cost ₹55,00,000; O&M 1 percent of cost a year (₹55,000); inverter replacement in year 12 at 6 percent of cost (₹3,30,000); degradation 0.5 percent a year; discount rate 10 percent. The tariff, cost, O&M and replacement figures are placeholders for your own numbers.

Formulas.

  • Year-n net saving = G x (1 - 0.005)^(n-1) x T - O&M - replacement in year 12
  • Simple payback = years until cumulative net saving equals the cost
  • IRR = the discount rate at which the present value of the 25 years of net savings equals the cost

CAPEX results. Year-one saving = 1,57,800 x 8 = ₹12,62,400; less O&M ₹55,000 gives ₹12,07,400. Payback = 4.6 years (with degradation). IRR over 25 years = 21.1 percent (pre-tax). NPV at 10 percent = about ₹49.4 lakh.

Sensitivity: IRR and payback by cost and tariff (same other assumptions):

IRR and payback of the 100 kW model by system cost and grid tariff
System costAt ₹6 per kWhAt ₹8At ₹10
₹45,00,00019.2%, 5.0 years26.4%, 3.7 years33.5%, 3.0 years
₹55,00,00015.1%, 6.3 years21.1%, 4.6 years27.0%, 3.6 years
₹65,00,00012.2%, 7.5 years17.4%, 5.5 years22.5%, 4.3 years
  • At ₹6 per kWh
  • At ₹8 per kWh
  • At ₹10 per kWh
%010203040₹45,00,000₹55,00,000₹65,00,00019.2%26.4%33.5%15.1%21.1%27%12.2%17.4%22.5%%010203040₹45,00,000₹55,00,000₹65,00,00019.2%26.4%33.5%15.1%21.1%27%12.2%17.4%22.5%
IRR of the worked 100 kW CAPEX model by system cost and grid tariff
ItemAt ₹6 per kWhAt ₹8 per kWhAt ₹10 per kWh
₹45,00,00019.2%26.4%33.5%
₹55,00,00015.1%21.1%27%
₹65,00,00012.2%17.4%22.5%
IRR of the worked 100 kW CAPEX model by system cost and grid tariffSource: Calculated in this article from the stated assumptions: 1,57,800 kWh in year one, 0.5% annual degradation, O&M 1% of cost a year, inverter replacement in year 12 at 6% of cost, 25 years, pre-taxIllustrative inputs, not a quotation. Replace them with your own tariff and written quote.

The same site returns an IRR anywhere from 12.2 to 33.5 percent depending on two inputs. That spread, not any single figure, is the reason to get the tariff slab and the written quote right before choosing a model.

Optional tax benefit. If your accountant confirms a first-year depreciation rate d and your tax rate is t, the first-year tax saving is cost x d x t. As an illustration only, d = 40 percent and t = 25 percent give 55,00,000 x 0.40 x 0.25 = ₹5,50,000. Adding that to year one lifts IRR to 23.1 percent and shortens payback to 4.1 years. Set it to zero if you cannot use it. Whether the rate applies to your asset, regime and year is a tax question; see the depreciation checklist.

The OPEX side: what the PPA does over time

Assumptions: PPA tariff P = ₹5.50 per kWh in year one, escalating 3 percent a year; same generation and degradation as above; no upfront cost.

Formula. Year-n saving = G x (1 - 0.005)^(n-1) x [grid tariff in year n - 5.50 x 1.03^(n-1)]

Year one: 1,57,800 x (8 - 5.50) = ₹3,94,500, which is 31 percent of the ₹12,62,400 grid bill for those units. What happens next depends on the grid tariff path:

PPA saving over time under a flat and a rising grid tariff
CaseYear 1 savingYear 10Year 25Total over 25 yearsNPV at 10%
Grid tariff flat at ₹8₹3.95 lakh₹1.24 lakh-₹4.45 lakh₹1.49 lakh₹14.6 lakh
Grid tariff rises 3% a year₹3.95 lakh₹4.92 lakh₹7.11 lakh₹134.5 lakh₹43.5 lakh

With a flat grid tariff the PPA tariff passes ₹8 in year 14 (5.50 x 1.03^13 = ₹8.08), and the saving turns negative. The same CAPEX case at a 3 percent rising tariff has an IRR of 24.3 percent and an NPV of about ₹78.3 lakh, against ₹49.4 lakh when flat. The comparison therefore turns on two numbers you can check: the PPA escalation clause and a defensible view of your grid tariff.

The four-question decision matrix

Work through these in order.

  1. Do you own the roof for longer than the payback, with a margin? If you rent or hold a short lease, CAPEX can leave you with a stranded asset. Compare your remaining tenure with the payback from your own model, for example the 4.6 years above; a lease that ends before that point favours OPEX with a term aligned to the lease.
  2. Can you fund the system at a cost below the project return? Compare your cost of capital with the IRR from the sensitivity table. If debt costs more than the IRR, or capital is needed for the core business, OPEX preserves it.
  3. Can you use the tax benefit and do you have taxable profit? A loss-making entity or a trust may not be able to use depreciation, which narrows the gap between the models. Confirm with your accountant.
  4. Does your policy allow a capital asset? Lender covenants, board policy or a preference for off-balance-sheet treatment can point to OPEX.
How the four answers point to CAPEX or OPEX
AnswersLikely direction
Yes to all fourCAPEX, then optimise financing
No to question 1OPEX, with a term and exit clause aligned to the lease
No to question 2 onlyCAPEX with project finance, or OPEX
No to question 3 or 4Run both models with your numbers; the gap is narrower

Financing a CAPEX purchase

Ask lenders for current rates and terms, including IREDA and your own bank, and ask whether any guarantee-cover scheme applies to your borrower category. See the solar loan guide for how to compare offers.

Checks before signing a PPA

  • Escalation. A fixed escalator compounds: 1.03^19 = 1.75, so a ₹5.50 tariff is about ₹9.64 in year 20. Compare it with a realistic grid path.
  • Exit and buyout. Ask for the buyout price formula and the penalty for early termination or relocation.
  • Term and renewal. Align the term with your tenure and the roof’s condition.
  • Performance and maintenance. Confirm who guarantees generation and who replaces the inverter.
  • Minimum project size. RESCOs set minimum sizes that differ; ask for the current one.
  • Billing basis. Confirm that the PPA is metered on units delivered and how shortfalls are handled.

The RESCO model guide and the zero-cost solar guide give a due-diligence checklist.

Evaluating bids for a CAPEX project

If you choose CAPEX, the EPC bid evaluation guide covers the criteria. Ask for: current module and cell scheme requirements and the exact inverter documents verified separately (MNRE’s ALMM lists cover modules and cells, not inverters); a performance ratio guarantee modelled for your site with shortfall compensation; payments tied to delivery, installation and commissioning milestones; a written O&M contract; and GST shown line by line, with 5 percent applying to specified solar devices since 22 September 2025 (see the GST guide). For the IRR arithmetic with more detail, read solar IRR and payback for C&I and the NPV and IRR entries.

Where Qbits fits

For a CAPEX buyer the inverter sits at the centre of generation, and its replacement cost and downtime belong in the model, as the year-12 line above shows. Qbits’ published catalogue lists several three-phase on-grid families for commercial use. Harmonic limits, warranty terms, monitoring interfaces and project outcomes vary by model, so no single figure applies across them. Match the exact model, datasheet revision and documents to your electrical design and lender requirements, and request test reports, grid-interface documents, the written warranty and the service process. Qbits pricing is quote-based through dealers.

Contact Qbits with the exact model, site inputs and documents relevant to your project, and confirm the responsible party, deliverable and commercial terms in writing.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between solar CAPEX and OPEX models in India?
In the CAPEX model the business buys and owns the system, paying upfront or with debt, and keeps all savings and any tax benefit. In the OPEX model, also called RESCO or PPA, a developer owns the system on the business's roof and sells the power at a contracted per-unit tariff. CAPEX asks for capital and gives the larger long-run return. OPEX asks for none and gives a smaller saving that depends on the PPA terms.
Which model gives the better return?
It depends on four inputs: the grid tariff you offset, the system cost, your cost of capital and the PPA tariff with its escalation. In the worked 100 kW example, ownership returns an IRR of about 21 percent and a payback of 4.6 years on assumed inputs, while the PPA gives a saving of 2.50 rupees per kWh in year one that shrinks if the PPA escalates faster than the grid. Rerun the model with your own quote.
How do I know whether CAPEX or OPEX suits my business?
Answer four questions in order: do you own the roof for longer than the payback, can you fund the system at a cost below the project return, can you use the tax benefit, and does your balance-sheet policy allow a capital asset. A No on the first question usually points to OPEX; a No on the others calls for a closer model.
Is accelerated depreciation available on solar?
Depreciation on solar plant depends on the asset classification, the tax regime you file under and the year, so confirm the current rate and your eligibility with a chartered accountant before counting it. Earlier versions of this guide used a fixed rate; the model now treats the first-year tax benefit as an optional input. Only the owner of the asset claims it, so it does not arise for a buyer under a PPA.
What are the main risks of a PPA?
Escalation, exit and term. A PPA tariff that rises 3 percent a year overtakes a flat grid tariff within about 14 years in the worked example. Check the escalation clause, the buyout option, the penalty for early termination if you relocate, and who carries performance and maintenance risk.
Can a business finance CAPEX with a loan and still save money?
Often yes if the savings exceed the instalment. In the worked example a loan of 70 percent of cost at an assumed 9 percent over 7 years has an instalment of about 61,943 rupees a month against about 1.0 lakh rupees a month of first-year savings. Get actual rates from lenders and include the processing cost, margin money and tax effect.
Is GST on solar equipment 12 percent or 5 percent?
GST on specified solar devices is 5 percent since 22 September 2025. Composite supplies have a sourced split treatment, so ask for the tax line by line on the quotation. The GST guide explains the entries.
Akash Hirapara
Written by

Akash Hirapara CFO, Qbits Energy

CFO overseeing solar financing, procurement, and channel partner enablement at Qbits.

Related Reading
Guide 17 min

Solar RESCO Model India: Guide for C&I Buyers

Solar RESCO model India lets C&I buyers get rooftop solar with zero upfront cost: the RESCO owns the system and you pay a PPA tariff below your grid rate. Full PPA guide inside.

Guide 18 min

Zero Cost Solar India: RESCO & OPEX Models

Zero cost solar India via RESCO: pay a PPA tariff below your grid rate with no upfront capex. Understand PPA contracts, OPEX models, and the RESCO Due Diligence Checklist.

Guide 17 min

Solar IRR and Payback for C&I in India, Real Math

Solar IRR calculation India for C&I: an illustrative 100 kW Karnataka system at ₹55 lakh capex shows about 17.7% IRR and a 5.7-year payback with 40% accelerated depreciation. Full 5-line business case inside.

Get Started

Continue researching your solar decision

Use the related guides and definitions to check the assumptions and requirements relevant to your project.