Skip to content
Solar Software

Aurora vs OpenSolar 2026: Honest Comparison

Aurora is tracked at roughly $159 to $259 per user per month by third parties, since it does not publish list pricing. OpenSolar leads with a free tier. Both have ceilings. Here is the honest Aurora vs OpenSolar comparison and the option both users should consider.

Nirav Dhanani
Nirav Dhanani CEO
June 14, 2026 Updated October 14, 2026 10 min read

Aurora and OpenSolar sit at opposite ends of the residential solar design software market. Aurora is the premium US-residential pick. OpenSolar leads with a free tier, describing its model as free to installers and funded through partner and marketplace relationships. Both have ceilings. This guide compares them honestly and introduces the third option: SurgePV ships engineering depth plus proposals at flat per-seat cost.

Engineering depth of Aurora upper tier, total cost of OpenSolar at volume

A SurgePV engineer designs one of your real projects in 20 minutes and walks through the cost math.

Book a Free Demo

20 minutes · Bring a real project · No credit card

Aurora vs OpenSolar at a Glance

Aurora, OpenSolar and SurgePV compared by capability
CapabilityAurora SolarOpenSolarSurgePV
Starting price~$159 / user / moFree$1,299 / user / yr (5-seat)
Top price~$259 / user / mo + add-onsAdd-ons stack$1,899 / user / yr (Individual)
AI 3D roof from satelliteAI Mode add-onLimitedIncluded all plans
8,760-hour module-level shadingUpper tierSimplifiedIncluded all plans
Bankable P50 / P75 / P90AvailableNot a positioned use caseIncluded
AI design assistantAI Mode (paid)LimitedClara AI included
Native proposalsSales Mode (paid)Yes (templates)Included
Multi-country code libraryUS primaryAvailableNEC, IEC, AS/NZS, IS
Hardware neutralityYesPartner integrationsYes
Free trial, no credit cardLimitedFree tierYes

Rows reflect each vendor’s published feature set and pricing at time of writing. Aurora does not publish list pricing, so its figures are indicative from third-party trackers. Confirm current scope and price with each vendor.

Where Aurora Wins

Strong US residential 3D, mature AHJ library, large installed base, and integrated Sales Mode at the upper tier. Best for established residential installers committed to the premium tier. See our Aurora Solar pricing breakdown for exact plan costs, or Aurora vs HelioScope if engineering depth matters more than proposals.

Where OpenSolar Wins

Free entry tier for installers running simple residential roofs. Active community and reasonable design experience at the entry level. Our OpenSolar pricing guide covers the true cost of “free” once add-ons stack up, and the OpenSolar alternative comparison ranks six tools if you are ready to move on.

Why SurgePV Is the Third Option

SurgePV is built for installers who outgrew OpenSolar’s free tier but cannot justify Aurora’s premium pricing. The product ships:

Pricing Comparison

Annual cost by team size, as listed in the sections below (Aurora and OpenSolar figures as stated in this post)
TeamAurora (Entry or Mid + AI Mode + Sales Mode)OpenSolar (free + extensions, realised)SurgePV (flat)
1-seat solo residential designer~$2,500 to $3,000 per year$1,000 to $1,800 per year$1,899 per year
3-seat residential team~$10,000 to $12,000 per year$3,500 to $6,000 per year$4,497 per year
5-seat residential + small C&I team$14,000 to $18,000 per year$6,000 to $10,000 per year$6,495 per year

1-seat solo residential designer

  • Aurora Entry + AI Mode + Sales Mode: ~$2,500 to $3,000 per year
  • OpenSolar free plus paid extensions at 10 projects per month: $1,000 to $1,800 per year realised
  • SurgePV Individual: $1,899 per year flat (all included)

3-seat residential team

  • Aurora Mid + AI + Sales Mode: ~$10,000 to $12,000 per year
  • OpenSolar Pro + extensions x 3: ~$3,500 to $6,000 per year realised
  • SurgePV 3-User Team: $4,497 per year flat (all included)

5-seat residential + small C&I team

  • Aurora Mid + AI Mode + Sales Mode: $14,000 to $18,000 per year
  • OpenSolar Pro + extensions × 5: $6,000 to $10,000 per year realised
  • SurgePV 5-User Team: $6,495 per year (all included)

Skip the upgrade-from-OpenSolar dilemma

SurgePV ships the engineering depth of Aurora upper tier and the simplicity of flat per-seat pricing.

Compare Plans

Annual billing · Cancel anytime · Includes Clara AI

Who Should Choose Each

  • Choose Aurora Solar if you are US-residential at the upper tier with established workflows.
  • Choose OpenSolar free if pure small residential is your entire scope and add-ons stay manageable.
  • Choose SurgePV if you want engineering depth, multi-country support, and flat per-seat pricing.

Ready to skip the Aurora-vs-OpenSolar decision?

SurgePV combines AI 3D roof modeling, 8,760-hour shading, bankable yield, financial modelling, and white-label proposals in one platform at flat per-seat pricing.

Book a Free Demo

Or see pricing · explore the platform

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Aurora Solar or OpenSolar?
It depends on your scope. Aurora is the stronger residential design platform at the upper tier with AI Mode and Sales Mode. OpenSolar's free tier is better for installers running simple residential rooftops at low volume. Both hit ceilings at scale: Aurora on price, OpenSolar on engineering depth. SurgePV ships engineering depth and proposals at flat $1,299 to $1,899 per user per year.
Is Aurora or OpenSolar cheaper?
OpenSolar's entry tier is free. Aurora does not publish list pricing, but third-party trackers put its entry near $159 per user per month at time of writing. At realistic volume with add-ons, OpenSolar's realised cost typically clears $1,000 per user per year. Aurora's stays high. SurgePV's $1,299 per user per year for teams of 5 is competitive with both on realised cost and ships the full feature set.
Does OpenSolar produce bankable yield reports?
OpenSolar is positioned around sales and design rather than project-finance reporting, so teams raising debt generally produce P50, P75, P90 evidence in a dedicated simulation tool. Aurora's upper tier and every SurgePV paid plan produce those outputs using 8,760-hour module-level methodology. Confirm what your lender requires.
Why would I consider SurgePV over both?
Three reasons. First, total cost: flat $1,299 to $1,899 per user per year beats Aurora at the upper tier and matches OpenSolar's realised cost at any meaningful volume. Second, engineering depth: 8,760-hour shading and bankable yield on every paid plan. Third, multi-country: NEC, IEC, AS/NZS, IS code libraries with country-specific tariffs.
Can I run both Aurora and OpenSolar in parallel?
Some teams do, with Aurora for upper-tier residential and OpenSolar for entry-cost residential. The stack management overhead is real. SurgePV's flat per-seat plan removes the both-or-either choice.
Is Aurora's Sales Mode similar to OpenSolar's proposal output?
Both produce branded proposals. Aurora Sales Mode is a paid add-on on top of the base plan. OpenSolar ships templated proposals at the free tier with advanced features behind paid extensions. SurgePV includes interactive web proposals with e-signature in 9 languages on every paid plan.
How do I switch from Aurora and OpenSolar to one tool?
Book a free SurgePV demo, run a 4-to-6-week parallel migration, and cancel both at renewal. SurgePV's AI 3D from satellite rebuilds site geometry from Aurora projects in seconds, and OpenSolar projects map across the same hardware-neutral database.
Nirav Dhanani
Written by

Nirav Dhanani CEO, Qbits Energy

Co-founder & CEO driving Qbits Energy's product strategy and growth across India.

Related Reading
Solar Software 11 min

Aurora vs HelioScope 2026: Honest Comparison

Aurora vs HelioScope is the classic US solar design software debate. Aurora wins on residential, HelioScope wins on engineering. Here is the honest comparison and the option neither user usually considers.

Solar Software 10 min

HelioScope vs PVsyst 2026: Engineer Comparison

HelioScope vs PVsyst is the engineering team's classic decision. PVsyst owns lender acceptance, HelioScope owns browser workflow. Here is the honest comparison and the browser-based bankable option both engineers should consider.

Get Started

Continue your solar software research

Compare the workflow, inputs and limitations that matter to your task before choosing software.