If you are looking for a Solargraf alternative in 2026, you are most likely an installer who values Solargraf’s residential proposal velocity but needs deeper engineering, a manufacturer-independent platform, or multi-country support. This guide compares six realistic alternatives and explains why we recommend SurgePV for teams that want proposal speed plus the rest of the stack.
Same proposal speed, plus the engineering depth and manufacturer independence Solargraf is not positioned for
A SurgePV engineer designs one of your real projects in 20 minutes, including 8,760-hour shading and a branded proposal at the end.
Book a Free Demo20 minutes · Bring a real project · No credit card
Why Installers Look for a Solargraf Alternative
Engineering depth
Solargraf is positioned around residential quoting and proposals. 8,760-hour module-level shading and bankable P50, P75, P90 outputs are not what it leads with, so confirm current scope with the vendor if you need them. SurgePV ships the 8,760-hour shade analysis engine on every paid plan. See our shading analysis guide for the full methodology.
Hardware neutrality
Solargraf is an Enphase subsidiary, so if you buy equipment from several manufacturers, check how the platform treats components from outside that ecosystem. SurgePV is manufacturer-independent, with a database of 70,000 modules and 12,000 inverters.
Multi-country support
Solargraf is built around the US residential market. SurgePV covers NEC, IEC, AS/NZS, IS code libraries and PM Surya Ghar, SREC, FiT, Einspeisevergütung tariffs, with proposals in 9 languages. For India-specific projects, EPCs cross-checking code compliance often reference a dedicated engineering resource center alongside the design platform’s own libraries.
SurgePV vs Solargraf at a Glance
| Capability | SurgePV | Solargraf |
|---|---|---|
| AI 3D roof from satellite | Included all plans | Not the headline capability |
| 8,760-hour module-level shading | Included all plans | Not the headline capability |
| Bankable P50 / P75 / P90 | Included | Not positioned as a bankability tool |
| Manufacturer independence | Yes | Enphase subsidiary |
| Multi-country code library | NEC, IEC, AS/NZS, IS | Built around the US market |
| White-label web proposals | Included | Yes |
| Multi-language proposal | 9 languages | English-led, confirm current options |
| AutoCAD DXF / DWG export | Included | Not the headline capability |
| AI design assistant | Clara AI, included | Not the headline capability |
What You Get With SurgePV
- AI 3D roof modeling from satellite in under 60 seconds
- Clara AI natural-language design assistant
- 8,760-hour module-level shading on every paid plan
- Hardware-neutral database of 70,000 modules and 12,000 inverters
- Solar financial modeling with country-specific tariffs
- DXF/DWG export for AutoCAD handoff
- Branded solar proposals with e-signature in 9 languages. Compare the full field in our solar proposal software guide
- QuickEstimate as the sister CRM, API handoff
Proposal speed plus the engineering depth Solargraf is not positioned for
SurgePV starts at $1,299 per user per year for teams of 5, hardware-neutral, multi-country, Clara AI included.
Compare PlansAnnual billing · Cancel anytime · Includes Clara AI
Other Alternatives to Solargraf
1. SurgePV: Hardware-Neutral All-in-One
Full engineering + proposals + multi-country at flat per-seat cost. See the line-by-line breakdown in SurgePV’s own Solargraf comparison page.
2. Aurora Solar
US-focused. Pricing is quote-based, with roughly $159 to $259 per user per month widely reported and AI Mode charged separately; confirm with the vendor. See our full Aurora Solar alternative comparison.
3. Pylon
US residential and proposal-led. Not positioned as a deep engineering tool, so pair it accordingly. See our full Pylon alternative comparison.
4. Enact Solar
Residential and proposal-first. Its proposal experience is English-led, so confirm current language options with the vendor. See our full Enact Solar alternative comparison.
5. OpenSolar
No licence fee, with paid add-ons and partner integrations, so cost depends on which add-ons you take. See our full OpenSolar alternative comparison.
6. QuickEstimate
Sister CRM, pairs cleanly with SurgePV.
Pricing
| Tool | Per seat / yr | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| SurgePV | $1,299 to $1,899 | All-in-one, published pricing |
| Solargraf | ~$1,200 to $2,400 | Per-seat equivalent derived from Solargraf’s published plan and project-credit pricing; confirm with the vendor |
| Aurora | Not publicly published | Quote-based; an annualisation of third-party-reported monthly figures lands near $1,900 to $3,100, unverified, and AI is charged separately; confirm with the vendor |
| Pylon | Not publicly published | Quote-based; confirm with the vendor |
| Enact | ~$1,200 to $2,000 | Not publicly published; reported figure, confirm with the vendor |
| OpenSolar | Free + add-ons | No licence fee, paid add-ons |
See SurgePV pricing.
Who Should Choose Each Tool
- Choose Solargraf if fast US residential proposals are your scope and a platform owned by a hardware manufacturer suits how you buy.
- Choose SurgePV if you want manufacturer independence, full engineering depth, multi-country support, and integrated proposals. The solar design software for installers flow handles the design-to-proposal workflow end to end.
- Choose Aurora for US-residential at the upper tier.
- Choose Pylon if proposal velocity is the main thing you are buying.
- Choose Enact for residential proposal-first workflows.
- Choose OpenSolar for small residential at lowest cost.
Contact Qbits with the exact model, site inputs and documents relevant to the request. Confirm the responsible party, deliverable, fees and response time after submission.
Ready to switch to a hardware-neutral platform?
SurgePV combines AI 3D roof modeling, 8,760-hour shading, bankable yield, financial modelling, and white-label proposals in one platform across 70,000 modules and 12,000 inverters.
Book a Free DemoAbout This Comparison
Pricing, features and product positioning described here were checked in July 2026 using publicly available vendor information. Vendors change pricing, packaging and capabilities without notice, and several do not publish prices at all. Treat every figure as a starting point for your own enquiry rather than a quotation, and confirm current terms directly with each vendor before making a purchasing decision.
All product names, logos and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Reference to them here is for identification and comparison only and does not imply any affiliation with, sponsorship by, or endorsement from those companies. SurgePV is a Qbits Energy product, so treat this as a vendor comparison written by an interested party and weigh it alongside independent sources and your own trial of the tools.
Where we could not verify a claim from a primary source we have said so in the text rather than repeating it. If you believe anything here is inaccurate or out of date, contact us and we will review and correct it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SurgePV better than Solargraf for solar installers?
Does SurgePV produce proposals as fast as Solargraf?
Is Solargraf still independent or owned by a panel manufacturer?
What does SurgePV have that Solargraf does not?
Why do installers switch from Solargraf to SurgePV?
Is there a free trial of SurgePV?
Can I migrate Solargraf projects to SurgePV?
Nirav Dhanani CEO, Qbits Energy
Co-founder & CEO driving Qbits Energy's product strategy and growth across India.