Skip to content
Solar Software

Best Solar Software France: The Complete 2026 Stack

The prime is gone and surplus sells at 1.1 centimes. French software bought before June 2026 is now modelling two revenue lines that no longer exist.

Nirav Dhanani
Nirav Dhanani CEO
August 3, 2026 Updated October 14, 2026 12 min read

Every French solar proposal written before 5 June 2026 contained two revenue lines that no longer exist. The prime à l’autoconsommation was abolished for new installations under the revised S21 arrêté, and surplus buyback for new applications fell to 1.1 centimes per kWh excluding tax. Against a retail price many times higher, exported energy became close to worthless in the space of a single day. Quotes issued the week before were correct. Templates that were accurate in May now promise an upfront bonus the customer will not receive and export revenue roughly twenty times larger than what arrives. This guide covers what the French stack has to do now.

Short version. The best solar software for a French business in 2026 is whichever tool has been updated for the post-S21 rules and can dispatch a battery against an hourly load profile. The first is a correctness test and the second is a capability test, and a surprising number of platforms fail both.

This page covers the category as a whole. For the tool-by-tool comparisons see our best solar design software France and best solar proposal software France guides.

Size a French job for self-consumption

A SurgePV engineer takes one of your addresses, runs 8,760-hour simulation against the household load with battery dispatch, and produces the French-language proposal from the same record.

Book a Free Demo

20 minutes · Bring a real project · No credit card

The Six Categories, And Where The Damage Is

Six software categories and what the French market requires of each
CategoryWhat it doesEffect of the June 2026 reform
Design and simulationLayout, hourly self-consumption, battery dispatchSizing logic inverted
Proposal and quotingTwo deleted revenue lines, honest export figureNeeds rebuilding for nearly every team
CRM and pipelineLeads, follow-up, conversionUnaffected
ComplianceNF C 15-712-1, NF C 15-100, ConsuelUnaffected
Project executionEnedis connection, commissioningConnection date now has 20-year consequences
MonitoringPerformance, service, warrantyUnaffected

What Is Genuinely France-Specific Right Now

Two populations of systems. Pre-5-June connections keep old rates for twenty years. This is not a transitional detail, it is a permanent feature of the French market for the next two decades, and it means every sales conversation includes a comparison against economics that were real and are unavailable. Address it in the proposal rather than leaving it to the salesperson.

Sizing inverted. Under the old regime the bonus scaled with size and surplus had a buyer, so both pushed toward capacity. Now nothing does. Capacity beyond the daytime load curve earns roughly a twentieth of what the household pays to import.

Storage as core economics. A battery now captures nearly the entire retail spread on everything it shifts. Whether it pays still depends on cost and the household’s evening demand, but the arithmetic starts from a far better place than a year ago.

The honest small export line. At 1.1 centimes, a residential system exporting several thousand kilowatt-hours earns a few tens of euros. Showing that plainly makes the argument for self-consumption better than any assertion could.

NF C 15-712-1, NF C 15-100 and Consuel. Installation standards and the attestation of conformity required before commissioning.

Latitude range. France spans enough latitude that Lille and Marseille differ in the self-consumption balance, not just in total yield. Site weather rather than a national assumption.

Where French Teams Overbuy And Underbuy

Underbought: hourly self-consumption modelling. The defining requirement now, and French quoting never needed it under the old tariff.

Underbought: battery dispatch simulation. The natural answer to the reform, and unsellable on assertion alone.

Underbought: updated tariff data. Not a purchase so much as a maintenance failure. The single highest-return action available to most French installers is auditing their template for a prime that no longer exists.

Overbought: nothing significant. As in the Netherlands and Italy, the French problem is correctness rather than overspend.

Model the battery as part of the design

SurgePV dispatches storage against the hourly load and generation profile, so a French customer sees exactly how much 1.1 centime energy becomes retail-value energy.

Book a Free Demo

20 minutes · Bring a real project · No credit card

The Platforms French Businesses Should Evaluate

1. SurgePV, the integrated core

Design and proposals from one record, with post-reform tariff logic, hourly self-consumption analysis, battery dispatch modelling, NF C 15-712 and NF C 15-100 references, Consuel-aware documentation, site-specific weather and 8,760-hour module-level shading. White-label proposals with e-signature in 9 languages including French. $1,299 to $1,899 per user per year.

2. PV*SOL

Strong European residential and small commercial modelling with capable self-consumption and storage tooling, which positions it reasonably for the new regime. Desktop-based. Our PV*SOL alternative guide covers the trade-offs.

3. PVsyst

The bankable simulation reference, frequently named by lenders on commercial and ground-mount work. No proposal layer and no French incentive logic. See our PVsyst alternative review.

4. OpenSolar

Free, fast, and produces a decent customer document. Weaker on the hourly dispatch the reform made essential. See our OpenSolar alternative comparison.

5. Aurora Solar

Strong residential design built around US net metering, which France has never operated and is now further from than ever. See our Aurora Solar alternative comparison.

6. Spreadsheets plus a yield tool

Common in smaller French practices, and the single most likely place an abolished prime is still being subtracted from a customer’s total.

France Solar Software Stack Comparison

France solar software stack compared by capability and tool
CapabilitySurgePVPV*SOLPVsystOpenSolarAurora
Design and simulationYesYesYesPartialYes
Proposal from design recordYesPartialNoYesYes
Post-reform tariff logicYesManualManualNoNo
Hourly self-consumptionYesYesYesPartialYes
Battery dispatch modellingYesYesPartialPartialYes
NF C 15-712 referencesYesPartialManualNoNo
Site-specific weatherYesYesYesPartialPartial
French-language proposalsYesPartialNoPartialNo

Worked Example: 6 kWp Near Lyon, Three Ways To Quote It

An illustrative comparison, not a specific customer project. Household consuming 4,000 kWh a year, roof supporting 6 kWp, roughly 7,200 kWh generation, 35% self-consumption without storage rising to about 70% with a battery.

A 6 kWp system near Lyon quoted three ways (illustrative)
A: old templateB: current ratesC: current rates plus storage
Self-consumed2,520 kWh2,520 kWhabout 5,040 kWh
Exported4,680 kWh4,680 kWhabout 2,160 kWh
Export revenue shownOverstatedabout EUR 51about EUR 24
Upfront bonus shownPrime appliedNoneNone
Is the quote accurate?NoYesYes

Column A is what a stale template produces and it is simply wrong. Column B is honest and will look worse to a customer comparing quotes, which is the commercial problem the reform created for careful installers.

Column C is the answer to that problem. Doubling self-consumption roughly doubles the only benefit that still exists. Whether the battery cost justifies it depends on the household’s evening demand and hardware pricing, which is a calculation to run rather than a claim to make. But an installer who can only offer columns A and B is choosing between dishonesty and a weak quote.

Who Should Choose What

  • Choose SurgePV if you need post-reform tariff logic, hourly self-consumption and battery dispatch in one tool.
  • Choose PV*SOL if you are desktop-based, work mainly residential, and value its component depth.
  • Choose PVsyst where a lender names it on commercial or ground-mount work, paired with separate quoting.

After signing, pipeline and follow-up sit in a CRM. QuickEstimate takes the handoff from SurgePV by API.

Built for the rules that took effect in June

Post-reform tariff modelling, hourly self-consumption, battery dispatch, NF C 15-712 references, Consuel-aware documentation and French-language proposals from $1,299 per user per year.

Book a Free Demo

Or see pricing · Europe compliance library

The Bottom Line

France did not trim its solar incentives in June 2026. It removed them, and most tooling has not caught up.

  • Verify your tool has been updated. A platform still applying the prime or the old buyback is confidently wrong.
  • Stop sizing to the roof. Surplus earns 1.1 centimes, so capacity beyond the daytime load is close to free energy for the grid.
  • Put storage in the main comparison. It captures nearly the full retail spread and it is the answer to a weakened export case.
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What changed for French solar software on 5 June 2026?
Two revenue lines disappeared. The prime à l'autoconsommation was abolished for new installations under the revised S21 arrêté, and the surplus buyback rate was cut to 1.1 centimes per kWh excluding tax for new applications. Connection requests validated by Enedis before that date keep the previous tariffs and bonus for twenty years. Any tool still applying a prime or a meaningful buyback rate is modelling a scheme new customers cannot enter.
How does a 1.1 centime buyback change system design?
It makes surplus generation nearly worthless and moves the entire value case into self-consumption. Against a retail price many times higher, exported energy earns roughly a twentieth of what the household pays to import. Filling the roof, which was reasonable under the old tariff, now builds capacity producing energy nobody will meaningfully pay for. Correct sizing tracks the daytime load curve, which requires hourly modelling rather than annual totals.
Does the reform make storage worth modelling?
It makes storage the central design question. Every kilowatt-hour a battery shifts from midday surplus into evening consumption converts something worth 1.1 centimes into something worth the full retail import price. That is a far stronger case than existed under the old regime, when a battery competed against a decent export tariff. A design tool that cannot dispatch a battery against an hourly load profile cannot size a French system correctly now.
Why do customers quote better numbers than your proposals show?
Because installations whose connection request was validated by Enedis before 5 June 2026 retain the previous arrangements for twenty years. That creates a large installed base with genuinely excellent economics that are no longer available. A neighbour's payback figure or an article from last year can be entirely accurate and entirely inapplicable, and that objection will arrive in nearly every French sales conversation for years.
Which standards must French solar software reference?
NF C 15-712-1 for photovoltaic installations connected to the public network, alongside NF C 15-100 for the general low-voltage installation, with a Consuel attestation of conformity required before commissioning. Carrying these as a library rather than relying on the installer reduces submissions that come back with queries.
Is French residential solar still worth installing?
For the right load profile, yes, but the case is narrower and honest quoting matters more. A household consuming heavily during daylight, or one adding storage, still displaces expensive retail import and the numbers work. A household empty all day that exports most of its generation now earns 1.1 centimes for that energy, and a well-built model will show the project struggling. Telling that customer the truth is better business than selling a system that will disappoint.
Which solar software should a French installer start with?
Design and proposals in one tool with hourly self-consumption analysis and battery dispatch, because the reform moved everything there. SurgePV covers both at $1,299 to $1,899 per user per year. Before buying anything, verify it does not still apply the prime, because a great many templates and platforms do.
Nirav Dhanani
Written by

Nirav Dhanani CEO, Qbits Energy

Co-founder & CEO driving Qbits Energy's product strategy and growth across India.

Related Reading
Solar Software 11 min

Best Solar Design Software France: 2026 Guide

Since 5 June 2026 surplus sells at 1.1 centimes and the autoconsommation bonus is gone. French design is now entirely about self-consumption. Six tools compared.

Solar Software 11 min

Best Solar Proposal Software France: 2026 Guide

The prime is gone and surplus sells at 1.1 centimes. Any French proposal still showing bonus and buyback revenue is quoting a scheme that closed in June. Six tools compared.

Get Started

Continue your solar software research

Compare the workflow, inputs and limitations that matter to your task before choosing software.